Showing posts with label polls. Show all posts
Showing posts with label polls. Show all posts

Friday, 18 September 2009

In two weeks the curtains will come down on The Katharine Hepburn Awards. It’s the first time that I’ve dedicated a complete award ceremony to one star. And Kate deserves it because she’s the biggest star of them all. In celebration of the Ceremony I’m opening to the floor to your opinions on any of Kate’s performance. They can be on any films [including the five performances she’s up for]. It can be positive or even [gasp] negative; it can be a dissection or a tirade. It is all up to you. Seeing that I want this to be diverse as possible and cover as many persons as possible – but I won’t restrict you. Email me at dangerous.liaison231@yahoo.com and tell me your choice [or comment below] If you don’t have a blog you can send me your article and I will post it here. The day of the event – 3rd October.


                      
While we’re on the subject of Awards for Stars I might start another one of these sometime in mid November for another star. I’m not sure if it will be an actor though, whoever it is I know I will be rusty since there are few other than Hepburn whose filmography I have almost exhausted. I’m toying with these choices – Nicole Kidman, Martin Scorsese, Woody Allen, Judi Dench...but other than possibly Scorsese I’m not going crazy over any of them. What do you think? Do any of these float your boats? Any ideas yourself?

Monday, 14 September 2009

Voting has closed on the choosing the nominations for the Katharine Hepburn Awards and now it is time to choose the winners. The nominees are not what I expected...but oh well, you have to know. I'll be doing some profiles on each category over the next two weeks. Voting closes on September 28th.
                                           

I suppose Alex was right when he called this the weakest category. However four of the five are Oscar nominees...so it's not that bad.
                      

As much as I like admire Anthony Hopkins I don't think he was my favourite son in The Lion in Winter. No John Castle? Surely you jest? Oh well...Dean Stockwell is there. Surprisingly none of the Oscar nominated performances got in...hmmm. And Montgomery Clift? I did not see that coming.
                                     


This is a good batch, to be honest. But no Spencer Tracy? What a travesty...and there were so many choices. I guess Kate and Spencer were not the best screen couple. We have two Oscar winning performances. Two that should have been nominated [Cary Grant, and Cary Grant], and one that should have one. This is going to be tough.
                                            

A good list...but no love for David Lean's good work for Summertime. Oh well.
                                     

It's an interesting bunch of nominees. The biggest snub for me was probably Jane Hudson in Summertime, but I suppose the film is not that popular. Two of Hepburn's Oscar winning roles are here, two other Oscar nominated and one that we'll all pretend won an Oscar.
                           

And the final category...A very good bunch. Let's see what will happen here.
                                       
Oh well, people. Enjoy voting. Spread the word...and do your worst.

PS. Contribute also...

Addendum...Voting closure has been pushed back to October 17th. I'm going to be swamped in upcoming weeks.

Wednesday, 26 August 2009

In my recent poll pitting recent blockbusters films head to head Pirates of the Caribbean came out on top. Edging out Spider Man and Ocean’s Eleven among others. I had thought that Spider Man was going to take the cake, but no, Johnny Depp’s Jack Sparrow prevailed.


What is it that people like about this movie [and I mean just this one and not the franchise]? What was it that made it one of the biggest films of 2003? Why were critics so impressed with it? Why or how did Johnny Depp manage to win a SAG award over pimped contenders like Sean Penn and Jude Law? These are all good questions, let me try to answer them.

Starring the aforementioned Depp with Orlando Bloom and Keira Knightley, Pirates of the Caribbean is a Disney comedy film. Well I thought it was a comedy. But now I don’t know. The other day James was doing a list of potential action stars, and I commented that I’d like to see Keira [among others] in an action film. JD responded asking me what about Pirates of the Caribbean. Which got me thinking, is this an action flick? Is it a genre flick? I figure maybe I should back up and give you a plot rundown but if you don’t the plot…well…that’s just bad. Okay, fine. [You’re lucky I’m in a good mood.]

The film takes place during the time of colonisation in the Caribbean. While sailing to Jamaica with her father, the Governor, an adolescent girl happens upon a young boy unconscious boy floating on some wreckage. Elizabeth spies a necklace around his neck which she confiscates as the young boy is lifted unto the ship. Years later after some interesting machinations involving a rakish Captain Jack Sparrow we come to realise how Will ended up that wreckage as a child. Enough plot.
Standing at the top of Pirates of the Caribbean and its success is Johnny Depp. I believe this is the best performance that Depp has ever given. As the dashing Jack Sparrow with a slightly drunken flair there isn’t any self consciousness or any suggestion of trying too hard. It’s just ludicrous, over the top and deliciously fun. I was all for Sean Penn in Mystic River and Jude Law in Cold Mountain that year, but had Johnny Depp won, I won’t have minded at all. I don’t think anyone can deny the magnificence of this performance.

What I hate about people who remember this movie, though, is that the supporting performances are so often criticised. This movie is not supposed to be a game changer in terms of acting [Depp is just good like that], so why complain that Knightley and Bloom bring nothing new to their roles. They’re perfectly effective as the young couple. We’re supposed to feel three things. That Will Turner is too good to be an apprentice, Elizabeth Swann is more than a pampered rich girl, and that the two belong together. I don’t know about you, but I believed all that. And though the script was not bad, the treatment of their romance was not as prolific as the treatment of Jack’s escapades. So of course it pales in comparison. But the movie’s called Pirates of the Caribbean, Lovers in the Caribbean. Geoffrey Rush is also great as the token villain in the film.

The reason that it never occurred to me that this was an action film is probably the setting. A period piece action piece? Surely you jest! The film is beautiful to look at – the art direction, the costumes, the visual effects, the cinematography are all eye catching…and it sounds good too [props to the sound mixing]. Even technically this is a good film. And the special effects are not those that bang on your head like those horrid Transformer films. It's all done with a level of sophistication that belies Jack Sparrow's intention.

If you're one of those rare persons who've never seen this movie, I'm not giving away the plot...and if you are one of those rare persons who have not seen this movie...go out and get it NOW. It's a good film, and it'll keep you occupied for two hours and more. This film makes people happy and for something that's enjoyable and is well acted and produced...that's a rarity. I think that's a large reason for the rabid following that the film has picked up...and imagine all this in a Disney film. Really?

Pirates of the Caribbean was one of the films that I seriously considered including in my top 100 films. It did fall short [it’s in my 200].

So were you bowled over by the Pirates? Did you look and walk away? Do you think this is an action movie?

Don't forget to VOTE

Monday, 24 August 2009

I had to repost this. Sorry for the technical difficulties.

I am obsessed with Katharine Hepburn. In the seven months I’ve started this blog, I’ve not highlighted my idiosyncrasies. Today the idea came to me that Katharine Hepburn rocks. More than I have already acknowledged to myself. As such, I’ve decided to hold the Katharine Hepburn Awards which will be completed by September 25th. The rules are simple, all of Kate’s films face off – the screenplays for each, her leading men, her supporting men, her featured women, the director. You vote for five nominees in each of the categories. You’ll be given two weeks…and then it’ll continue like a normal Awards race. I’ll count the nominees…post them sometime during the second week in September and then you’ll vote for your winner each category. It’s simple. Oh, I forgot to say, vote for five only and please be honest.













Thank you very much for voting, spread the word as much as you can – I want this to be as diverse as possible. Do you like the idea? Are there any other categories I should add? Which actors deserve their own awards? Speak up!

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...
 

FREE HOT VIDEO | HOT GIRL GALERRY