Showing posts with label Halle B.. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Halle B.. Show all posts

Friday, 4 February 2011

Both Frankie & Alice, and Night Catches Us examine race relations in the seventies – one more overtly than the other. They both had the unfortunate fate of being released and getting lukewarm reception from audiences (although Frankie & Alice is only now expanding in theatres).
           
Geoffrey Sax directs Frankie & Alice without palpable interest for the time period, in fact Sax seems least interested in any extraneous bit of his characters opting to single insularly put his focus on Berry – which ends up being a decision that works for him. Halle Berry has never ranked among my favourite actors but I am elated to see her returning to the good work that I know she’s capable. 
It’s difficult to separate the film’s somewhat generic plot from the multiple incarnations of people with dissociative identity disorder. It’s a theme that ostensibly suggests mugging for the camera (and by extension) awards’ bait. But, Berry approaches the role with a striking amount of integrity ignoring – on the most obvious of levels at least – the potential for gimmickries that lies in the film. The fact that one of her multiple personalities is a racist ends up developing as a plot-point not played for the obvious shock potential one would expect. Even, Berry, in her occasional tendency to overdo employs a restraint here and plays well opposite Stellan Skarsgård. The two get the most signficant screen time, but Chandra Wilson and Phylicia Rashad offer up poignant supporting turns suggesting that they both deserve more recognition on the big screen. There comes a moment towards the end when the film becomes a bit too interested in being histrionic, but Vanessa Morgan (as a young Frankie) is surprisingly good in her part delivering on the emotional resonance along with Berry.
B/B-
         
And, yet, though Night Catches Us exists with the very taut racial tension of the era Tanya Hamilton (writer and director) never takes it too far. There’s an admirable dormancy to the atmosphere that works in evoking that sort of unrest after great activity and in the midst of all this dissonance Marcus (Mackie) returns to his old neighbourhood where he may or may not have caused the death of his brother by ratting him out to the police. 
 
Hamilton avoids the usual tricks, like making that issue a major plotpoint. Instead, she has Mackie and Washington playing opposite each other to great results. Hamilton is interested in studying her characters – each of them, an she almost always goes for the sedate instead of the jarring which works for her. The race relations are almost aside to the main arc of the broken characters trying to rebuild their lives, and though her sedateness could be mistaken for reticent she deserves praise either way.
B/B-

Tuesday, 25 August 2009

Link You

The more attentive of you have probably realised that the two polls I had at the side of the page have been closed for a while. The winners were Beauty & the Beast and The Pirates of the Caribbean – your choices. So I’ll be getting up the reviews for them. Pirates of the Caribbean should be up by tomorrow and Beauty & the Beast by Saturday. In case you haven’t noticed, do check out the Katharine Hepburn polls. Alex in Movieland is looking at the Best Actresses of 1957; his last post was on Elizabeth Taylor in Raintree Country. Take a look at his penetrating review.

Slage Sowdive who’s notorious for hating the Oscar’s picks in Actress and Best Actress defends Halle Berry’s win for Monster’s Ball. Although I like Halle that year it was between Sissy Spaceck [In the Bedroom] and Nicole Kidman [Moulin Rouge!] for me.

Movie Mania has a short rant about Network, overrated he calls it. What do you think?

And StinkyLulu is back and ready to start his Supporting Actress Smackdown. So head over here and vote for your year.

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...
 

FREE HOT VIDEO | HOT GIRL GALERRY