Showing posts with label Don Cheadle. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Don Cheadle. Show all posts

Wednesday, 28 April 2010

Any legitimate ad for Antoine Fuqua’s latest film, Brooklyn’s Finest, is intent on stressing that this is the man who helmed 2001’s Oscar winner Training Day. I’m not too certain that that’s a good thing. Structural and thematic similarities could easily belie the fact that Brooklyn’s Finest is not a Training Day redux, even if the parallels are existent. Brooklyn’s Finest is concerned less with the battle between the good men and the bad men and more interested of the battle of good and evil within oneself. One the film’s most appealing elements is its lack of judgment (in the first three quarters of the film, at least). Gere’s retiring policeman, Hawke’s devoted family man and Cheadle’s undercover policeman. Of course none of the men are defined by the labels I give them; it’s in the creation of the nuanced characters – something the actors should be lauded for – that makes Brooklyn’s Finest a success.

Hawke’s Sal is a devoted family man, but this is merely one element of his tortured character. I’ve expressed my appreciation of Hawke time and time again, and he doesn’t disappoint here. Hawke is never content with acting in black and white always making for the shades of gray. I can’t refer to each of his performances as a superlative, but his work in Brooklyn’s Finest would be worthy of praise in a fair world. His moments at home (opposite Lili Taylor) are especially poignant. There’s no telling what will happen at the end of the year though, in fact I’m sure it would be forgotten. For the most part, the thin line between good and bad persists in the actions of Gere and Cheadle completing the unholy trinity. Cheadle has never been given a legitimate chance to impress since his impressive performance in Hotel Rwanda and I’ve never been impressed with the legitimacy of Gere’s classification as a good actor. However, both give excellent performances too. Gere’s is more of a slow burn, it’s not until the end we’re able to fully appreciate his technique but both men offer important shades to their characters.

What stops Brooklyn’s Finest from being truly excellent though is that as the film moves into its finale Martin seems content with doing away with  the cast (and the plot) in the most pedestrian of fashions. After having our three leading men in ruts the solution is unsatisfying and the audience is left there, waiting for an absolution that never comes. It robs the actors of the good work they’ve done so far and robs the many supporting actors giving good performances (Wesley Snipes, Will Paton, Lili Taylor, Jesse Williams, Brian O’Byrne) of any profundity. For a film that does so well in its first half, the film’s finale is done by the book. However, an array of good to excellent performances from the cast members makes this a worthy choice for viewing. Brooklyn’s Finest is not the greatest, but it’s a valiant effort from the production, and a brilliant effort from the actors.
   

B-

Wednesday, 31 March 2010

One of the best thing about those fickle things called Oscars is when you bitch about them with like-minded people. Many have devoted time to critiquing the women, the pictures &etc, but what about the men? Best Actor is often an interesting thing to talk about, so last weekend Luke (of Journalistic Skepticism), Jose (of Movies Kick Ass) and I sat down and discussed the 2004 Best Actor Race. Here’s part
        
Andrew: Okay, so let's get down to it. 2004. Cheadle, Depp, DiCaprio, Eastwood and Foxx. On a purely superficial level is this one of the most diverse Best Actor lineups of the decade?
      
Luke: For this category, yes, it appears it's stepped away from its typical "old white guy" tendencies.
        
Jose: Not really, we've got four real people and Clint Eastwood. Ins't that what they always go for?
         
Luke: Yeah, except for Eastwood. Being a part of the "Best Actor" lineup seems a little off for him...
        
Jose: But they always stick him somewhere, whether it be director, producer or actor, I'm honestly surprised he's never won best score or song yet.
         
Andrew: Well in reality it's not that diverse. As you said Jose, four real people. Tis real heavy; but actor wise – we have the legend (Eastwood), the black comedian (Foxx), the black serious actor (Cheadle), the former teen heart throb (DiCaprio) and the international star (Depp)...
       
Jose: and four out of five were in Best Pic nominees, so it's rather uninspiring, especially in the face of the ones who were snubbed.
        
Luke: Very true - and what an utterly confusing lineup for Best Picture... but I guess that's another story, hm?
      
Andrew: That being said. I guess we'd all agree that Eastwood would be the first one we'd boot off of the nominee list?
         
Jose : actually not me. He’s my second fave from the nominees
          
Luke: Oh definitely - I mean, I just saw Don Cheadle's performance for the first time today actually, but I'd already say he was superior to Eastwood - or at least what I remember of Million Dollar Baby.
    
Andrew: Now you've got me interested, Jose. Who would you say is the worst of the five?
     
Jose: Worst? Foxx by all means
      
Andrew: Well to be honest, Eastwood and Foxx are battling it out, but even though I don't agree with the pick I can understand why they fall for Foxx...Eastwood does nothing for me.
      
Jose: It is such an unnatural performance, not that I've a problem with over the top acting, but he struck me as disrespectful in some aspects
       
Andrew: What do you think of Foxx in Ray, Luke?
         
Luke: I'm not a big fan of rewarding impressive impersonations, so Foxx isn't high on my list. I think with Ray I had to keep from letting myself get wrapped up in loving the music and remember that he's not truly giving a great performance. I thought the movie itself was better than he was - especially Regina King. Loved her.
         
Andrew: I'll agree on that. The thing is sometimes actors can pull off the imitative thing, but the thing with Foxx his comedic talents lay in his impersonations and he was obviously pretending to be Charles and never being him.
            
Jose: I agree, I rest my case by saying I love the fact that Cate won for playing Kate Hepburn that year looking nothing like the woman, while the praise for the whole clone thing Foxx had going on with Ray is still a mystery to me
             
Andrew: Foxx just isn't that talented to pull it off and make it work, I think.
          
Jose: Definitely! He was riding on a goodwill thing, I think he won the Oscar the day Ray Charles passed away.
          
Luke: Right - it really did just feel like an extended In Living Color sketch or something... it didn't seem like he was taking the "acting" part of the job entirely seriously.
Luke: So I take it we can all agree that Jamie Foxx left a little something to be desired?
                        
Jose: I mean the man won the Album of the year Grammy as well
                
Andrew: Duly noted, Jose. Eastwood and Foxx would be easily knocked off the list...but what are your thoughts on Depp, gentlemen? He's in the middle for me
.                      
Luke: I'm on the fence about it. I thought Finding Neverland was only okay, and this nomination was very clearly a part of the Academy's new love of him (which seems to have faded since Sweeney Todd). It definitely wasn't a good showcase of his talents.
            
Jose: He was OK, I think it's part of the sudden crush AMPAS and the world developed on him after Pirates. They’d have nominated him for anything to make up for the snubs throughout the 90's.
         
Andrew: I'm a little fool-hardy about Finding Neverland. I know it's faulty, but I'm still sucked in (like Chocolat, but that's another story).
               
Jose: Haha me too but it's more about Winslet and Christie than about Depp
                 
Luke: Yeah, that one was totally Winslet's show (and a little bit Freddie Highmore too).
                  
Jose: Right, too bad they screwed it all with that awful Charlie and the Chocolate Factory adaptation
            
Andrew: A reason I'm so willing to praise Depp is that he doesn't go over board with Barrie like he could. He seems almost willing to be a little on the sidelines.
   
Jose: You know what my problem with that was? That you could see Depp underacting. The man is all about extremes I think and weird and cooky works better for him than understated
                         
Andrew: On that note of being understated, what do you think of Cheadle in Hotel Rwanda. I have a feeling that AMPAS was trying to throw off their reputation for being anti black with Foxx and I think Don would have been a more deserving (black) winner.
         
Jose: He's great! But he rides a bit too much on the Sydney Poitier wave of political correctness for him to make too much of an impact
                    
Luke: Totally agree! I was definitely think about Sidney as I was watching it.
                   
Andrew: That didn't occur to me, but now that you mention it...
           
Jose: I felt like they were consciously trying to make him into a black Oskar Schindler
           
Luke: It was quite different than what I expected - it had sort of an early '90s filming vibe to it that I rather enjoyed. I think he would've made a far better choice than Foxx.
                       
Andrew: I was telling my sister recently that the thing with Cheadle is that unlike Foxx, Cheadle is not BLACK. He's African American (or whatever), and AMPAS has a way of liking to reward the extremes.
                     
Jose: But yeah I agree, if they were trying to make it about race, Cheadle was worthier than Foxx
              
Luke: I think that Cheadle's advantage was that he seemed to have the best in show act all wrapped up. I mean, Nick Nolte and Joaquin Phoenix just bugged me
           
Andrew: But I was impressed with Okenodo. Why doesn’t the woman get more roles?
                      
Jose: But there was Sophie too! I think the film suffered because it was so small
                            
Luke: Can I just voice my confusion about Hotel Rwanda's nomination for Best Cast at the SAGs? Why is it that Phoenix and Nolte were listed out of only four people when there were dozens of other worthy speaking parts in the film? Is it a requirement to be a famous thesp to get a nomination in that category?
                
Jose: Not if you're in Slumdog Millionaire...
              
Andrew: Well look at the situation with Precious, all those girls from class were left off and in An Education for some random reason Cara Seymour wasn't mentioned even though she had more lines than Thompson and Williams.
           
Luke: AND Seymour happened to be one of the best performances in the film!
                
Jose: But doesn't that depend on the studio submissions? Or is it SAG who chooses who's worthy or not?
                   
Andrew: Does it, Jose? I have no idea.
         
Jose: If it's the studios it makes much more sense they'd want Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie to be SAG winners over people like extra # 1 or guy who's famous in the Middle East
               
Andrew: How did Brangelina get into this coversation?
              
Jose: Well I remembered he won this year and she just came into the equation haha
          
Andrew: Back to 04. You probably know this already, but DiCaprio tops my list easily. I'm a HUGE Aviator fan. Am I over praising him?
                       
Jose: Not at all, he was robbed! And they did it again by snubbing him for Revolutionary Road!
                  
Luke: No, he tops my list too. I think The Aviator has lost some of its steam for me on future viewings, but of this group, he's easily my top choice. Sidenote - I'm watching Catch Me If You Can currently, another performance I thought he was wrongly overlooked for.
Andrew: I think the thing about Oscar, it seems they're willing to reward someone who comes out of nowhere and gives a good (or baity) performance eg, Brodey, Foxx but they won't reward people who've grown up in the business and steadily improved eg. DiCaprio, or even Pitt and Depp
       
Jose: AMPAS is such a bully that way. They love one hit wonders because they are less threatening to the establishment
         
Luke: Maybe these steady steam-gatherers are the ones who'll have to wait until they're in their 50s…
                
Jose: …or get an honorary one in that awful non-televised gala
                    
Andrew: I love how you make AMPAS some like some sinister big brother type, Jose.
          
Jose: isn't it though?
                
Luke: For some reason, I just don't see DiCaprio winning anytime soon. It seems like Aviator was that moment in time where it seemed possible. But now, people just don't get as excited about him anymore.
              
Jose: it's like they're setting him up to fail, like they did with Winslet til last year. when he makes The Departed they nominate him for the hideous Blood Diamond.
             
Andrew: If I had my way I'd immediately knock out Eastwood and Foxx for Jude, Jim or Javier.
          
Luke: I would definitely place Jim Carrey in my second spot for the year...
                   
Jose: Jim Carrey won that Oscar in my mind
                 
Luke: I'd throw in Jude and Gael as well
                
Jose: What about Paul, Andrew?
        
Andrew: I don't know what it is about Sideways, but I always feel as if it's a joke that I'm not in on. I just don't get it? Am I the only one?
             
Luke: Oh gosh no, I don't understand the appeal of Sideways, whatsoever.
                 
Jose: Perhaps not but I still think Paul was sublime. The movie I don't love as much anymore.
                 
Luke: I just remember being very meh over Virginia Madsen, who at the time I saw it was the frontrunner for the Oscar.
              
Andrew: People always talk about being moved by Paul and Virginia (of course Paul is more worthy than Eastwood and Foxx) but I find Haden Church and Sandra Oh to be much more convincing.
              
Jose: I think that had a lot to do with how all the old white guys wanted to screw her and thought "if Paul can..."
            
Luke: And Paul Giamatti is so uncomfortable to watch... maybe it's because of those trailers for Big Fat Liar where he's the big angry blue dude with equally angry blue goatee. And Sanrda Oh was my favorite in the movie, Andrew.
                              
Andrew: Paul really has gone to the dogs, but I still love him. I'd have chosen him for my 05 Supporting list (over Gylenhaal too)...but that's a whole other post...
              
Luke: So where are we at guys? It seems we’re not so enthused about, well, anyone in this category. Where do they rank #1-#5 for you?
       
Andrew: DiCaprio , Cheadle (A-), Depp (B, B+ when I'm happy), Eastwood (C), Foxx (C)... I'm a lenient grader when it comes to acting though, it's more difficult to grade performances than films
        
Luke: (1) DiCaprio ... (2) Cheadle ... (3) Depp ... (4) Foxx ... (5) Eastwood [fairly similar, there]
                
Jose: DiCaprio A, Eastwood B, Cheadle B-, Depp B-, Foxx C
                 
Luke: So does this make us bitter people that the nearly unanimous least favorite was the eventual winner?
                
Andrew: Damn, right. I'm bitter.
            
Jose: Nah, if you like the Oscars this is actually fairly common, I'm quite used to it by now
            
Luke: Especially in this past decade. Sheesh.
                
Andrew: I was so invested in 04 - it was the first Oscar ceremony I was actually predicting, and Cate's win was one of the FEW highlights.
                
Jose: They tend to reward mediocrity and feel good about it
                 
Andrew: Bening's loss, MDB winning. Aaargh.
          
Jose: I almost shed a tear when Marty lost
                          
Luke: Oh god - yeah it was a pretty bad waste of a ceremony in terms of winners.
                     
Jose: ...And damn Julia Roberts should never present anything! She's always so happy when the so-so people win
                 
Andrew: She's just a happy person who loves her life.
                
Jose: Then she should hand out the Globe for Musical or Comedy not Best director at the Oscars... but I forgive her because she was robbed of a nomination that year as well...
               
Luke: Yeah, is it time to be imaginary yet? To right the wrongs?
                   
Jose: I'm sensing it'll be more interesting than tearing apart the nominees
                     
Andrew: Oh, crap. I though we did that. Okay, throwing it out: my list: DiCaprio and Law, then Carey and Cheadle and the final spot goes to either Javier Bardem or Johnny Depp or Liam Neeson.
           
Luke: My picks: Leonardo DiCaprio (The Aviator), Jim Carrey (Eternal Sunshine), Jude Law (Closer), Gael Garcia Bernal (Bad Education), and Matt Damon (The Bourne Supremacy) ... I like a hodgepodge.
                 
Andrew: I need to see Bad Education, but Luke's list looks way more respectable than Oscar...
                  
Jose: I'm biased when it comes to Pedro but yes you should. What was Liam in, Andrew?
               
Andrew: Kinsey...are you serious?
            
Jose: oh true hahaha, I always forget him and Laura.
                   
Luke: Ah, yes. Bad Education is top-notch.
                   
Jose: Mine would be 1.Jim Carrey 2.Leonardo DiCaprio 3.Gael 4.Ethan Hawke 5.Clint Eastwood
               
Andrew: Jose...Clint over Jude. CLINT over JUDE (f***ing) LAW - I'm the definition of an obsessed Jude fan, by the way. Be warned.
            
Jose: I just don't feel like Jude was as good, I loved him in Cold Mountain but he wasn't a stand out in Closer... coming from someone who'd nominated Julia, Clive and Natalie
                    
Andrew: Bastard...I forgive you though.
                      
Jose: Thank you.
              
Andrew: I'd call this the second/third Actor lineup of the year - along with 02, 05, 06...and maybe even 09 when I think about it?
          
Jose: I agree, but I prefer 03 over 05
                        
Andrew: Ooops, I mean I’d call this the second/third WORST actor lineup. 2005 was just a baaaaaaaad year, all around.
                  
Jose: I know, 05 and 08 mostly made me want to tear my eyes out in terms of Oscars because they were stupendous movie years
         
Luke: Talking best lineups of the decade in this category? I'm definitely going to have to go with '03 and '08. Although '07 was also mostly good.
                     
Andrew: My favourite best actor lineup last decade is easily 00. I'd choose anyone from there; but 03 and 07 are close behind.
                   
Jose: I disagree. Depp and Lee Jones over McAvoy can not be good in any way
                 
Andrew: I pretend Tommy Lee Jones isn't there...I really do.

Luke: That's what I meant by "mostly good." I just couldn't get into Michael Clayton like everyone else. You might hate this, but I actually really liked Depp in Sweeney Todd. Sue me.
          
Andrew: Oh crap, Michael Clayton was 07...? Okay, 07 is out. Hated that year.
               
Okay dear reader. Do you like this new feature? Any tips? What are your thoughts on the discussion? What did you think of 2004's Actor's Race? Sound off below!

Tuesday, 12 May 2009

I have exams going on right now, but I continue to post on the net or reading Film Experience and The Awards Circuit. Oh well, whatever. Still celebrating the imminent release of Nine I have another list of nine. Nine films I want to see made, I don't have all nine though, just three. Bear with me... My premise is simple these works of fiction need to be made into movies now with top notch actors to win some Oscars.

Anybody Can Do Anything based on a novel by Betty MacDonald

CAST
Directed by Stephen Daldry
Written by
Betty Bard Kirsten Dunst
Mary Bard Emily Blunt
Sidney Bard Annette Bening
Dede Bard Natalie Portman
Allison Bard Scarlet Johansson
Cleve Bard Haley Joel Osment
Gammy Susan Sarandon

This is a sort of autobiography work of fiction. The author Betty struggles to survive during The Great Depression, actually struggle is the wrong word. This novel is a work of comedy. It is hilarious. If you have not read it, go out and get it. NOW!

I have put some serious thought into adapting this (obscure and largely unknown) novel. I even wrote about 30 pages of script for it, but that was a few years back when I thought Nicole Kidman and Renee Zellweger would be great in it. They still could, but they’d be too old –which sucks. I know this isn’t a real movie, but I would have loved to see them in this Depression era comedy. I have always felt that Kirsten Dunst was a much better actress than people give her credit for. She never got the chance to show us. Since her performance in Interview With the Vampire I’ve always felt that she was going to be a great actress – and now more than a decade after the fact there’s nothing. I am a fan of Stephen Daldry. I’ve loved each if his three films – and he can do both comedy and drama exceptionally. This film would be a cross between the two genres. Emily Blunt is good at lightweight comedy, and Mary is the most colourful character in the novel, she has the strongest lines – and is just a little caustic (not like The Devil Wears Prada though…). Annette Bening is good at playing mothers, and the role of Sidney is just the type of easy-but-tough maternal character that could become a strong supporting role on screen. Portman, Johansson and Osment seem like a good trio to round out the rest of the family, and Susan Sarandon as the tough-as-nails grandmother is pretty much a no brainer, although the role in the book is not that big. They could always flesh it out though. I assume that they’ll probably want to change the name of the film though… I don’t know to what. Would this be a big player at the Oscars? Costumes and Art Direction could be forthcoming, and I think music should be an important part of the film. In terms of acting Emily Blunt and possibly Bening would be likely contenders, Dunst would have most of the weight on her though and she could be a contender – the role is a bit like a Depression Era Bridget Jones. The AMPAS loves Stephen Daldry so I guess he would get his fourth consecutive Best Director nod for this…

PS. Everyone of the family members have red hair!


Will Emily Blunt get the Oscar nomination she deserved for Prada?



Crooked House based on a novel by Agatha Christie

CAST
Crooked House directed by Joe Wright
Screenplay – Julian Fellowes
Charles Hayward – Peter Sarasgard
Sophia Leonides – Rosamund Pike
Magda (Sophia's Mum) – Kristin Scott Thomas
Philip (her Father) – Ralph Fiennes
Police Commissioner
Clemeny Leonides (Mrs. Robert Leonides)– Michelle Pfeiffer
Roger Leonides – Daniel Day Lewis - I could not resist
Brenda Leonides – Sally Hawkins
Laurence Brown – James McAvoy
Josephine – Saiorse Ronan
Eustace - Freddy Highmore
Edith de Haviland – Miranda Richardson


I like Agatha Christie but generally I don’t like her movies (except for Murder on the Orient Express). I don’t really like murder mystery films generally, which is why I have such an unabated love for Gosford Park, which focused on the people more than on the murder. I think Crooked House would work as a film, if done in the same vein as Gosford Park. It’s one of the lesser known Christie novels and the plot is simple. It’s immediately after the World War II and the police commissioner’s son – somewhat of a lothario wants to marry this beautiful socialite, but when her grandfather dies – ostensibly murdered she says she won’t be able to marry him unless the murder is solved. The thing is everyone is hoping that his wife – a woman almost forty years his junior did it, because if it is anyone else it could cause a huge scandal. Naturally the cast – list of suspects – is extensive; The murdered man’s children, grandchildren, a tutor who was having an affair with the wife, etc. The cast will be mainly British – as expected. And key roles need to have real heavyweights in them. Edith de Havilland is not a flashy role, but it is the key supporting role and Oscar likes those (Helen Mirren in Gosford Park.
Who knows, this could be a real heavyweight come Oscar season. I predict that it will be a tough year and it gets seven nods. Art Direction, Costume Design, Score, Adapted Screenplay, Cinematography (wins), Supporting Actress (Ronan or Richardson), Director. I predict that Kristin Scott Thomas and Peter Sarasgard give great performances, but are snubbbed by major award bodies.


Miranda knows more about the murder than she lets on... but is she the killer?

Fences based on a play by August Wilson

CAST
Fences directed by Kenny Leon
Screenplay –
Troy – Laurence Fishburne
Rose – Angela Bassett
Gabriel – Don Cheadle
Cory – Mechad Brooks
Jim – Mos Def
Alberta – Taraji P. Henson
Lyons - Keith Robinson

Why aren’t there any black period pieces? Granted, this is not really an actual period piece, but it is to some extent. This play won a Pulitzer Prize and a few Tony’s, I’ve never heard of a revival and I think it needs to be made into a film. Where has Angela Basset been all these years? I mean, she deserves more than having co-lead roles in Tyler Perry films. I know she could act the hell of this tour-de-force role (which won a supporting actress Tony for Mary Alice). It’s actually a leading role, but you know the Tony’s don’t care about category fraud. If this is made into a good film whoever gets this role will get some awards recognition, and then how could I not wax nostalgic and cast Laurence Fishburne as her husband. The role was originally played by James Earl Jones (he won a Tony for it) and Laurence Fishburne does remind me of Jones. This would be spectacular. Then there’s the role of Gabriel, his semi-retarded brother. Don Cheadle is one of my favourite actors period (he was the only thing I liked in Crash) and he is an Oscar nominated actor (he was second only to DiCaprio for his great performance in Hotel Rwanda). I know he can do this. The role of, the son is a big one and there’s no competent young black actor I could see in the role. Mechad Brooks had a few episodes on ABC’s Desperate Housewives as Alfre Woodard’s son and he delivered, I feel he could deliver as Troy. Lyons is Troy's other son, I don't know if Keith Robinson, but I like him. I think he showed some potential in Dreamgirls. I like the idea of a throwback casting for Mos Def as the best friend, if not him then Courtney B. Vance who was in the original Broadway Cast . I like the idea of Taraji as the other woman, just because I like Taraji, the role is unseen in the play – but they could meat it up for the play.
Kenny Leon showed promise and earned a DGA nod for her work in A Raisin in the Sun with Audra McDonald. I'll take a chance on him. Maybe Angela and Laurence could win Oscars. The role of Gabriel is prime Oscar bait.



So will Angie finally get that Oscar?

Which of these movies would you look forward to?

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...
 

FREE HOT VIDEO | HOT GIRL GALERRY