Showing posts with label Cher. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Cher. Show all posts

Friday, 20 May 2011

Saturday, 22 January 2011

For all its fault there’s one thing about Steve Antin’s Burlesque that it would be stupid to deny it of – Antin approaches the story with so much conviction that even when his script is at its weakest (and there are those moments) his exactitude – no matter how misplaced – ensures that the narrative moves – or occasionally plods – forwards always certain of where it wants to go. True to form, the story’s simple – a small-town girl makes a move to L.A. with hopes of making it big, enter Cher’s Tess with her potentially defunct Burlesque club with an oily businessman breathing down her throat ready to buy her out. In that way, Burlesque is sort of like one of those pastiche musicals that an aspiring musical director would make – a story that’s stripped down to the bare essentials with random numbers throwing sometimes (but not always) moving the plot forward but always offering up a slab of pleasure – just like the club itself.
The shining light of Burlesque is the fact that Antin knows what he wants and he has a sensibility for putting on musical numbers that’s – at times – fascinating to watch. It’s a little bit of Chicago, a little bit of Cabaret with some Moulin Rouge and possibly Coyote Ugly and a little bit of Spice World - for good measure thrown in just for kicks. He is not especially interested in hiding the fact that he’s taking cues from past films – but that knack for evoking films that have come before doesn’t make his decisions any less judicious – which is a welcome surprise. Not that Burlesque ends up becoming a technical spectacle of any sort, but it’s sumptuously put on – especially those costumes which I’m glad have attracted some love from the guilds. The music is never as extraneous as you’d expect there, even if one or two numbers hang just a little there’s always something nice to take away from it (Alan Cummings, forever a trooper, I’m talking to you).
And, the performances – Christina is neither excellent nor terrible in her debut. Despite her intensity in song, she has a surprising knack for the lighter portions of the film which makes me wish that Burlesque had played up the humour a bit more. This is the girl who was hung up on teasing us from “What A Girl Wants” to “Dirrty”. Even though her offstage persona is tinged with just the right amount of playfulness she’s not fully able to reconcile that with her stage performances which are just too adult to be authentic for Ally (but she’s fun to watch – either way). Cher, in all her agelessness offers up her usually acerbic self and makes the most of Tess. She’s fun to watch and though she’s regaled to a mere two numbers – neither of which turns into a duet with Christina (FAIL) she’s wonderful especially opposite Tucci who’s delightful – as always. Burlesque is the type of child on the playground that you’d willingly mock just because it wears its heart on its sleeves and is soooooooo obvious in all that it does. But, it doesn’t really care – and really, the teasing would be injudicious. It’s imprudent to call it a horrible film, because other than script that (admittedly) meanders a little too much to its own detriment, critiquing a film does not begin and end with a script. Burlesque is fun and at times even funny, perhaps harmlessly so – but we can’t really expect each film that falls in our laps to land with a resounding reverberation – can we?
     
B-

Sunday, 21 June 2009

3I’m one of the participants in Stinkylulu’s June Supporting Actress Smackdown for 1983. I was planning on writing reviews on each of the five films up for consideration, but I opted out. I don’t have patience. Instead I decided to write some short vignettes on each of the five actresses and anything that struck me about their films. Some more than others, but I decided I’d go with a 400 word limit. At the end of the series I'll post my favourites of the year. I'll begin with the music star making a cross over...

Cher in Silkwood

Silkwood marks the beginning of Cher’s Oscar career – which just consisted of two nominations really. The film is a showcase for Meryl Streep, this is the Meryl Streep that I liked – the Out of Africa, Sophie’s Choice Meryl not the One True Thing or Bridges of Madison County Meryl or the Doubt and The Devil Wears Prada Meryl, but I deviate. Cher plays the lesbian friend of Karen Silkwood the protagonist of this film. I have always admired (to some extent) Cher as an actress more than her as a musician. Strangely enough my favourite performance of hers was in The Witches of Eastwick, which is not exactly an excellent film – but Cher does well in these type of roles – as she further showed in Moonstruck. I figure that the AMPAS had an agenda nominating Cher for an Oscar. Her performance was actually her first good performance.

As I mentioned earlier, the film is a Meryl showcase and we know that not many could have outdone Meryl back in the eighties. I always get the feeling that Cher was just happy to get a good part; I can always notice a certain earnestness in her performance. It’s not the best performance, but she has me interested… and that’s one thing you can’t fault ever fault her for. She’s not a bland actor.

As I said earlier I figure that AMPAS had an agenda nominating Cher, she was a big movie star and they like the movie (not enough to give it a Best Picture nod), but just enough. So they're not too fond of Kurt Russel and are probably uncertain whether to put him in lead or supporting so they nominate Meryl and they nominate Cher. Back then they seemed really into giving popular people a chance to get invited to ceremony.

Cher's performance is not bad; it just wasn't one my favourite of that year, but it’s always good to see people improve their range.

You will notice I changed the font again, this time it's permanent.

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...
 

FREE HOT VIDEO | HOT GIRL GALERRY